
Major League Soccer · Matchday
2026-07-16 23:30:00 · 07:30 · Stade Saputo

Prediction Result
AI Predicted: 1-0|Actual: 0-0
AI Prediction
Top AI Picks
Goal Probability
Odds Comparison
| Bookmaker | Home | Draw | Away | EV Home | EV Draw | EV Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bet365 | 1.90 | 3.50 | 3.60 | -5.0% | -14.3% | -8.2% |
| Pinnacle | 1.96 | 3.89 | 3.50 | -2.0% | -4.7% | -10.7% |
| 1xbet | 1.99 | 3.85 | 3.69 | -0.5% | -5.7% | -5.9% |
| WilliamHill | 1.91 | 3.60 | 3.40 | -4.5% | -11.8% | -13.3% |
| Betfair | 1.91 | 3.60 | 3.80 | -4.5% | -11.8% | -3.1% |
| bwin | 1.95 | 3.70 | 3.40 | -2.5% | -9.4% | -13.3% |
| Unibet | 1.89 | 3.75 | 3.70 | -5.5% | -8.1% | -5.6% |
| Ladbrokes | 1.91 | 3.50 | 3.30 | -4.5% | -14.3% | -15.9% |
| Dafabet | 1.94 | 3.80 | 3.65 | -3.0% | -6.9% | -6.9% |
| CloudBet | 1.92 | 3.80 | 3.40 | -4.0% | -6.9% | -13.3% |
| Coral | 1.91 | 3.50 | 3.30 | -4.5% | -14.3% | -15.9% |
| Marathonbet | 1.92 | 3.70 | 3.55 | -4.0% | -9.4% | -9.5% |
| MelBet | 1.95 | 3.76 | 3.60 | -2.5% | -7.9% | -8.2% |
| 888Sport | 1.91 | 3.60 | 3.40 | -4.5% | -11.8% | -13.3% |
| BetVictor | 1.91 | 3.60 | 3.40 | -4.5% | -11.8% | -13.3% |
| 10Bet | 1.97 | 3.80 | 3.35 | -1.5% | -6.9% | -14.6% |
Polymarket Odds
Trading Strategy
Match Report
Match Analysis: CF Montréal 0–0 Toronto FC | MLS | July 16, 2026
Result Summary
The Canadian Classique delivered a tense but ultimately goalless affair at Stade Saputo, as CF Montréal and Toronto FC shared the spoils in a 0–0 draw. Despite Montréal's clear dominance in attacking output, neither side could find the breakthrough, leaving both coaches Philippe Eullaffroy and Robin Fraser with plenty to reflect on.
Match Analysis
On paper, the statistics paint a picture of Montréal's persistent attacking intent without the clinical edge to match it. The hosts generated 14 total shots to Toronto's 8, and crucially landed 3 shots on target while Toronto managed none — yet the scoreboard refused to reflect that pressure. Montréal also earned a commanding 9 corners to Toronto's 3 and registered 11 key passes compared to the visitors' 7, underlining their positional dominance in the final third.
Possession was perfectly split at 50% apiece, and both teams recorded an identical 81% successful pass rate, suggesting this was a structured, disciplined encounter from both sides rather than an open end-to-end contest. Toronto's 99 attacks narrowly edged Montréal's 93, though Montréal's 51 dangerous attacks to Toronto's 42 suggests the home side created the higher-quality opportunities.
The second half brought the most action, particularly through the substitutions. Eullaffroy made double changes at the 60th minute, bringing on Fabian Herbers and Daniel Pereira Gil for Victor Loturi and Samuel Piette respectively. Robin Fraser responded quickly, introducing Jules-Anthony Vilsaint and Malik Henry in the 61st and 62nd minutes. The injection of fresh legs seemed to raise the game's intensity, which was reflected in the two yellow cards that followed.
Daniel Pereira Gil, just minutes after coming on, was cautioned for a foul in the 64th minute, while Toronto's Daniel Salloi followed suit with a booking of his own in the 69th minute. Fraser made a further change at the 74th minute, bringing on Djordje Mihailovic in an apparent bid to add creativity. Montréal continued to push, introducing Owen Graham-Roache for Daniel Ríos at the 77th minute and Olger Escobar late on — but the deadlock held firm.
Toronto's defensive resilience, despite facing the greater volume of shots and corners, deserves recognition. With 5 shots off target from Toronto compared to Montréal's 3, the visitors showed occasional threat on the counter, but ultimately relied on collective organisation to secure the point.
Prediction Review
Our pre-match forecast had projected a 1–0 home victory for CF Montréal, with a 50% probability assigned to that outcome. With a confidence level of 60/100, there was acknowledged uncertainty — and it proved warranted. The statistics did support the logic behind the prediction; Montréal were the more dangerous team and generated the clearest goalscoring opportunities. However, the failure to convert any of their 3 shots on target proved decisive, and Toronto's defensive solidity was the difference between a predicted win and an actual draw.
Key Takeaways
- Montréal were the better side statistically but lacked the finishing touch to convert dominance into goals.
- Toronto's goalkeeping and defensive discipline earned a hard-fought away point despite zero shots on target.
- The substitutions after the hour mark shaped the game's tempo, but neither bench produced the match-winning moment.
- Both teams depart with a point from a closely contested rivalry match that will linger as a missed opportunity — particularly for the home side.
CF Montréal vs Toronto — Frequently Asked Questions
Who will win CF Montréal vs Toronto?
PredictNext's AI model favours CF Montréal (also known as CF Montreal) with a 50% win probability — CF Montréal 50%, draw 25%, Toronto 25%.
What is the predicted score for CF Montréal vs Toronto?
The AI forecasts a 1-0 scoreline for CF Montréal vs Toronto, generated with 60% model confidence.
Will CF Montréal vs Toronto have over 2.5 goals?
The model gives 58% for over 2.5 goals and 42% for under 2.5 goals in CF Montréal vs Toronto.
How accurate was the CF Montréal vs Toronto prediction?
PredictNext's AI predicted 1-0; the match finished 0-0. The winner call was incorrect.