
Bundesliga · Matchday
2026-10-17 13:30:00 · 21:30 · URSAPHARM-Arena an der Kaiserlinde

Prediction Result
AI Predicted: 1-1|Actual: 4-3
AI Prediction
Top AI Picks
Goal Probability
Odds Comparison
| Bookmaker | Home | Draw | Away | EV Home | EV Draw | EV Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bet365 | 2.45 | 3.75 | 2.70 | -2.0% | -4.4% | -6.9% |
| PinnacleVALUE | 2.55 | 3.72 | 2.73 | +2.0% | -5.1% | -5.8% |
| 1xbet | 2.46 | 3.72 | 2.72 | -1.6% | -5.1% | -6.2% |
| WilliamHill | 2.40 | 3.50 | 2.62 | -4.0% | -10.7% | -9.6% |
| BetfairVALUE | 2.45 | 4.00 | 2.60 | -2.0% | +2.0% | -10.3% |
| bwinVALUE | 1.13 | 7.75 | 23.00 | -54.8% | +97.6% | +693.5% |
| UnibetVALUE | 1.09 | 9.00 | 23.00 | -56.4% | +129.5% | +693.5% |
| Ladbrokes | 2.40 | 3.75 | 2.62 | -4.0% | -4.4% | -9.6% |
| BetVictor | 2.40 | 3.80 | 2.60 | -4.0% | -3.1% | -10.3% |
| DafabetVALUE | 2.55 | 3.85 | 2.60 | +2.0% | -1.8% | -10.3% |
| MelBetVALUE | 1.10 | 9.70 | 23.00 | -56.0% | +147.3% | +693.5% |
| Coral | 2.40 | 3.80 | 2.62 | -4.0% | -3.1% | -9.6% |
| InterwettenVALUE | 2.55 | 3.65 | 2.60 | +2.0% | -6.9% | -10.3% |
| Macauslot | 2.27 | 3.90 | 2.42 | -9.2% | -0.6% | -16.5% |
| CashpointVALUE | 1.09 | 7.85 | 27.29 | -56.4% | +100.2% | +841.5% |
| MansionBetVALUE | 1.10 | 8.90 | 34.00 | -56.0% | +127.0% | +1073.0% |
| Sbo | 2.32 | 3.50 | 2.43 | -7.2% | -10.7% | -16.2% |
| CloudBetVALUE | 1.10 | 8.90 | 27.00 | -56.0% | +127.0% | +831.5% |
| BetssonVALUE | 1.08 | 8.20 | 24.00 | -56.8% | +109.1% | +728.0% |
| Marathonbet | 2.48 | 3.72 | 2.69 | -0.8% | -5.1% | -7.2% |
Polymarket Odds
Trading Strategy
Match Report
Elversberg 4–3 FC Augsburg | Bundesliga | 17 October 2026
Result Summary
In a breathless Bundesliga encounter, Elversberg produced a stunning home performance to defeat FC Augsburg 4–3, despite being dominated statistically for large portions of the game. Maurice Krattenmacher was the creative catalyst early on, setting up two goals inside the opening ten minutes as the hosts raced into a commanding lead before ultimately holding on for a memorable victory at home.
Match Analysis
Elversberg wasted absolutely no time making their intentions clear. Lukas Petkov opened the scoring in just the fourth minute, converting a right-footed effort assisted by Krattenmacher, and the hosts doubled their advantage three minutes later when Lasse Günther added a second, again with Krattenmacher providing the creative spark. It was a devastating opening spell from Vincent Wagner's side, punishing Augsburg before they could find their footing.
Maximilian Rohr extended the lead to 3–0 in the 28th minute, heading home from a Felix Keidel assist to seemingly put the match beyond doubt. The statistics, however, told a rather different story developing beneath the surface. FC Augsburg dominated possession at 60% to Elversberg's 40%, mounted 133 attacks to just 72 from the hosts, and generated 71 dangerous attacks compared to Elversberg's 32. Manuel Baum's side were clearly the more active team across the pitch, but wasteful finishing and clinical Elversberg defending made the scoreline look one-sided.
A flurry of yellow cards added to the tension — Augsburg received three bookings in the first half through Han-Noah Massengo and Rodrigo Duarte Ribeiro (both in the 30th minute), with Chrislain Matsima following early in the second half. Elversberg were far from passive either, collecting four cards of their own across the ninety minutes. VAR also played a notable role, with interventions involving Raif Adam (twice) and Marius Wolf flagged throughout the contest.
Augsburg's triple substitution at half-time — bringing on Jeffrey Gouweleeuw, Michael Gregoritsch, and Anton Kade — injected fresh energy, and the visitors mounted a genuine second-half comeback. Julius Frederik Schmahl, introduced in the 40th minute for Noah Darvich, proved decisive at the other end, firing in a crucial fourth goal in the 89th minute from a Petkov assist to restore Elversberg's two-goal cushion. A 90th-minute consolation from Mert Kömür, set up by Hennes Behrens, gave the final scoreline a more competitive look, but it was ultimately too little, too late for Augsburg.
Elversberg's efficiency was remarkable given the shot count — Augsburg registered 29 total shots to Elversberg's 19, yet both sides produced an equal 8 shots on target, underscoring how the hosts made every clear chance count.
Prediction Review
Our pre-match forecast projected a 1–1 draw, assigning a 40% probability to an Elversberg win and 34.5% to an Augsburg victory. With a confidence rating of just 52/100, this was acknowledged as a highly uncertain fixture — and the outcome proved that caution was warranted. The prediction proved incorrect; Elversberg's extraordinary clinical efficiency in front of goal, combined with their rapid-fire opening spell, made this match far from the balanced affair our model anticipated.
Key Takeaways
- Elversberg's fast start was decisive — three goals before the half-hour mark proved insurmountable for Augsburg despite their statistical dominance.
- Krattenmacher's two assists in the opening exchanges illustrated how individual brilliance can override collective possession advantage.
- Schmahl's substitute impact — scoring after coming on in the 40th minute — was a pivotal tactical contribution from Coach Wagner.
- Despite Augsburg controlling large phases of play with superior attacking numbers, clinical finishing and game management ultimately defined Elversberg's victory.
Elversberg vs FC Augsburg — Frequently Asked Questions
Who will win Elversberg vs FC Augsburg?
PredictNext's AI model favours Elversberg with a 40% win probability — Elversberg 40%, draw 26%, FC Augsburg 34%.
What is the predicted score for Elversberg vs FC Augsburg?
The AI forecasts a 1-1 scoreline for Elversberg vs FC Augsburg, generated with 52% model confidence.
Will Elversberg vs FC Augsburg have over 2.5 goals?
The model gives 52% for over 2.5 goals and 48% for under 2.5 goals in Elversberg vs FC Augsburg.
How accurate was the Elversberg vs FC Augsburg prediction?
PredictNext's AI predicted 1-1; the match finished 4-3. The winner call was correct.