
Premier League · Matchday
2026-09-05 14:00:00 · 22:00 · The City Ground

Prediction Result
AI Predicted: 1-2|Actual: 0-0
AI Prediction
Top AI Picks
Goal Probability
Odds Comparison
| Bookmaker | Home | Draw | Away | EV Home | EV Draw | EV Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bet365 | 2.45 | 3.30 | 2.70 | -11.8% | -10.9% | -0.1% |
| PinnacleVALUE | 2.56 | 3.53 | 2.79 | -7.8% | -4.7% | +3.2% |
| 1xbetVALUE | 2.64 | 3.50 | 2.85 | -5.0% | -5.5% | +5.4% |
| WilliamHill | 2.50 | 3.25 | 2.70 | -10.0% | -12.2% | -0.1% |
| BetfairVALUE | 2.50 | 3.30 | 2.80 | -10.0% | -10.9% | +3.6% |
| bwinVALUE | 2.55 | 3.30 | 2.75 | -8.2% | -10.9% | +1.8% |
| Unibet | 2.65 | 3.15 | 2.65 | -4.6% | -14.9% | -2.0% |
| Ladbrokes | 2.45 | 3.20 | 2.70 | -11.8% | -13.6% | -0.1% |
| BetVictor | 2.50 | 3.25 | 2.70 | -10.0% | -12.2% | -0.1% |
| Sbo | 2.34 | 3.07 | 2.65 | -15.8% | -17.1% | -2.0% |
| DafabetVALUE | 2.55 | 3.40 | 2.80 | -8.2% | -8.2% | +3.6% |
| MansionBetVALUE | 2.43 | 3.25 | 2.76 | -12.5% | -12.2% | +2.1% |
| MelBetVALUE | 2.55 | 3.36 | 2.74 | -8.2% | -9.3% | +1.4% |
| Coral | 2.45 | 3.20 | 2.70 | -11.8% | -13.6% | -0.1% |
| CloudBetVALUE | 2.50 | 3.45 | 2.75 | -10.0% | -6.8% | +1.8% |
| 10Bet | 2.60 | 3.35 | 2.60 | -6.4% | -9.5% | -3.8% |
| MarathonbetVALUE | 2.60 | 3.44 | 2.80 | -6.4% | -7.1% | +3.6% |
Polymarket Odds
Trading Strategy
Match Report
City Ground Stalemate as Forest Hold Spurs
A hard-fought goalless draw at the City Ground saw Nottingham Forest deny Tottenham Hotspur all three points in this Premier League encounter on 5 September 2026. Despite Roberto De Zerbi's side enjoying the lion's share of possession and generating the greater attacking volume, Oliver Glasner's Forest were disciplined enough to grind out a point that will feel like a significant achievement for the home side.
Match Analysis
Tottenham arrived at the City Ground as the dominant force in terms of ball retention, recording 59% possession to Forest's 41%, and they backed that up with a clear edge in attacking intent — generating 99 attacks compared to Forest's 65, and 54 dangerous attacks to Forest's 46. The corner count told a similar story, with Spurs earning 10 corners to Forest's just two, suggesting sustained pressure from wide areas throughout the afternoon.
Yet for all their territorial dominance, Tottenham's final product was strikingly poor. De Zerbi's side managed zero shots on target from 12 total attempts, a statistic that will frustrate the coaching staff enormously. Forest, by contrast, mustered 2 shots on target from their 12 efforts — a more efficient if reactive display that ultimately defined the outcome.
The disciplinary picture illustrated the physical contest at the heart of the game. Destiny Udogie was booked in first-half stoppage time for a foul before being substituted off at the 61-minute mark, with Andrew Robertson introduced in his place. Nikola Milenković and James McAtee picked up yellows for Forest in the second half, reflecting the 20 fouls the home side committed across the ninety minutes — well above Spurs' total of 13.
A notable VAR decision at the 69-minute mark involving Neco Williams added to the drama without ultimately altering the scoreline, though the event appeared to halt Tottenham's momentum during a key passage of play.
Both managers turned to their benches as the match entered its final quarter. Glasner introduced Chris Wood for Liam Delap at the 74th minute in search of an aerial threat, while De Zerbi made a series of changes — bringing on Mohammed Kudus, Mykhailo Mudryk, and ultimately Dominic Solanke — in an attempt to unlock a resolute Forest backline. None of the alterations proved decisive, and the game finished scoreless.
Prediction Review
Our pre-match forecast gave this a 37% probability of a Tottenham win, with the draw rated at 27%, reflecting genuine uncertainty — and a low confidence score of just 42/100 underscored that. Ultimately, the prediction of a Spurs victory did not materialise. While Tottenham's statistical dominance aligned with what the model anticipated, the model underestimated Forest's defensive resilience and Spurs' inability to convert pressure into meaningful attempts on goal.
Key Takeaways
- Tottenham's attacking inefficiency is the defining narrative — 12 shots, zero on target, and 10 corners yielded nothing.
- Forest's defensive organisation under Glasner was exemplary, limiting Spurs despite clear inferiority in possession and attack volume.
- The 20 fouls committed by Forest highlight a pragmatic, physical approach that disrupted Spurs' rhythm effectively.
- Both sides will reflect on this result differently — a point gained for Forest, a point needlessly dropped for Tottenham.
Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham Hotspur Head-to-Head
Last 5 meetings between Nottingham Forest and Tottenham Hotspur: Nottingham Forest 5W · 0D · Tottenham Hotspur 5W.
5
Nottingham Forest wins
0
Draws
5
Tottenham Hotspur wins
Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham Hotspur — Frequently Asked Questions
Who will win Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham Hotspur?
PredictNext's AI model favours Tottenham Hotspur (also known as Tottenham) with a 37% win probability — Nottingham Forest 36%, draw 27%, Tottenham Hotspur 37%.
What is the predicted score for Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham Hotspur?
The AI forecasts a 1-2 scoreline for Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham Hotspur, generated with 42% model confidence.
Will Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham Hotspur have over 2.5 goals?
The model gives 44% for over 2.5 goals and 56% for under 2.5 goals in Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham Hotspur.
How accurate was the Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham Hotspur prediction?
PredictNext's AI predicted 1-2; the match finished 0-0. The winner call was incorrect.