
Major League Soccer · Matchday
2026-10-17 23:30:00 · 07:30 · Boston Stadium

Prediction Result
AI Predicted: 1-1|Actual: 1-0
AI Prediction
Top AI Picks
Goal Probability
Odds Comparison
| Bookmaker | Home | Draw | Away | EV Home | EV Draw | EV Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bet365 | 2.45 | 3.80 | 2.50 | -6.9% | -6.9% | -6.3% |
| 1xbetVALUE | 2.41 | 4.01 | 2.72 | -8.4% | -1.8% | +2.0% |
| WilliamHill | 2.40 | 3.60 | 2.45 | -8.8% | -11.8% | -8.1% |
| Betfair | 2.30 | 3.90 | 2.63 | -12.6% | -4.4% | -1.4% |
| bwin | 2.35 | 3.90 | 2.55 | -10.7% | -4.4% | -4.4% |
| Ladbrokes | 2.30 | 3.70 | 2.45 | -12.6% | -9.4% | -8.1% |
| MelBet | 2.36 | 3.92 | 2.66 | -10.3% | -4.0% | -0.2% |
| Coral | 2.30 | 3.70 | 2.45 | -12.6% | -9.4% | -8.1% |
| Marathonbet | 2.31 | 3.85 | 2.61 | -12.2% | -5.7% | -2.1% |
| BetVictorVALUE | 2.10 | 3.80 | 2.80 | -20.2% | -6.9% | +5.0% |
| Dafabet | 2.46 | 3.95 | 2.55 | -6.5% | -3.2% | -4.4% |
Polymarket Odds
Trading Strategy
Match Report
New England Hold Firm for Crucial Win Over Chicago Fire
Result Summary
In a match that defied the statistical narrative almost entirely, New England Revolution defeated Chicago Fire 1-0 at home on October 17th, 2026, in a result that will raise eyebrows given just how thoroughly Chicago dominated the proceedings. A solitary strike from Matt Polster, assisted by Carles Gil, proved to be the decisive and only moment of the night.
Match Analysis
From the opening whistle, Chicago Fire controlled this game in virtually every measurable way. Gregg Berhalter's side finished with 62% possession, generated 133 attacks compared to New England's 64, and had an extraordinary 10 corners to the Revolution's none. Chicago also led in total shots (19 vs. 5), shots on target (6 vs. 4), dangerous attacks (70 vs. 20), and key passes (13 vs. 5). On paper, this was a Chicago Fire performance — except for the scoreline.
The lone goal arrived in the 26th minute, when Matt Polster converted with a right-foot shot, set up by the ever-creative Carles Gil. That moment of quality proved to be the difference between the two sides for the entire 90 minutes. Despite their dominant possession and constant pressure, Chicago could not find a way past New England goalkeeper Matt Turner, who was kept busy throughout.
Marko Mitrovic's side was compact and disciplined, managing an impressive 85% successful pass rate of their own despite giving the ball away so frequently. New England's limited attacking output — just five shots in total — speaks to a clearly pragmatic approach that paid its dividends.
The bookings told a story of frustration. Andrew Gutman received a yellow card in the 58th minute for a foul and was subsequently substituted off in the 67th minute, with Noah Allen coming on in his place. Chicago also introduced Puso Dithejane for Jonathan Bamba and Anzor Mekvabishvili for Djé D'Avilla in quick succession, clearly seeking a spark. Johan Gomez also entered late for Leonardo Barroso in the 79th minute. For New England, Ethan Kohler picked up a yellow card in the 79th minute, while Dániel Gazdag entered for Luca Langoni in the 65th minute as Mitrovic looked to manage the game.
Despite the wave of second-half substitutions and Chicago's relentless pressure — reflected in their 6 shots on target — Turner and New England's backline held firm to preserve the clean sheet.
Prediction Review
Our pre-match analysis called for a 1-1 draw, with a roughly balanced probability split — 38% for a New England win, 37.5% for Chicago, and 24.5% for a draw. The forecast leaned toward a competitive, open contest, which in terms of attacking intent from Chicago, was partially accurate. However, our model underestimated New England's capacity to win without dominating possession or territory, and the low confidence rating of 54/100 reflected genuine uncertainty heading into this fixture. The prediction was ultimately incorrect, with the Revolution claiming all three points against the run of play.
Key Takeaways
- Matt Polster's 26th-minute goal was the game's only meaningful moment of finishing in what was otherwise a heavily one-sided contest statistically.
- Matt Turner was pivotal, holding firm against 19 Chicago shots.
- Chicago Fire's wastefulness in front of goal, despite generating far superior chances, was their undoing.
- Carles Gil's creative influence remains central to how New England create their moments of danger.
- For Berhalter's side, this is a sobering result — dominance without reward.
New England vs Chicago Fire Head-to-Head
Last 5 meetings between New England and Chicago Fire: New England 21W · 18D · Chicago Fire 24W.
21
New England wins
18
Draws
24
Chicago Fire wins
New England vs Chicago Fire — Frequently Asked Questions
Who will win New England vs Chicago Fire?
PredictNext's AI model favours New England with a 38% win probability — New England 38%, draw 25%, Chicago Fire 37%.
What is the predicted score for New England vs Chicago Fire?
The AI forecasts a 1-1 scoreline for New England vs Chicago Fire, generated with 54% model confidence.
Will New England vs Chicago Fire have over 2.5 goals?
The model gives 58% for over 2.5 goals and 42% for under 2.5 goals in New England vs Chicago Fire.
How accurate was the New England vs Chicago Fire prediction?
PredictNext's AI predicted 1-1; the match finished 1-0. The winner call was correct.