Parma
Parma
1 vs 0

Serie A · Matchday

2026-04-25 13:00:00 · 21:00

Pisa
Pisa

AI Predicted: 1-1|Actual: 1-0

WinnerScoreO/U 2.5BTTS

AI Prediction

Parma
PAR
1 - 1
Pisa
PIS
58%
Confidence
Low Confidence
41.2%Home
31.9%Draw
26.9%Away
46.3%Home
29.2%Draw
24.5%Away
**Parma** holds a slight edge despite missing key midfielder Marcel Léris to knee problems, as their home advantage and defensive stability should prove decisive. The absence of Léris will test Parma's midfield depth against a **Pisa** side that has shown vulnerability on the road. Expect a tight, low-scoring affair where set-piece execution could determine the outcome. **AI pick: Parma Win**

Top AI Picks

AI-generated recommendations
Two outcomes coveredHome or Draw
73% probability
Over or Under 2.5 goalsUnder 2.5
72% chance of 0-2 goals
Will both teams find the net?No
58% one side shut out
Handicap advantage pickNo data available
Most likely to scoreNo data available

Goal Probability

Parma Pisa
37%
64%
0
47%
36%
1
16%
0%
2
0%
0%
3+

Odds Comparison

41%
41%
0.0%
32%
32%
0.0%
27%
27%
0.0%
PredictNext AI Market Avg
AI & Market Agree: Home Win

Polymarket Odds

Loading prediction market data...

Trading Strategy

Loading market depth data...

Match Report

Parma Edge Out Pisa in Late Drama at the Tardini

Parma 1–0 Pisa | Serie A | 25 April 2026


Result Summary

A hard-fought Serie A encounter at the Tardini ended with Parma claiming all three points courtesy of a late winner from substitute Nesta Elphege, who struck with his right foot in the 82nd minute, assisted by fellow substitute Oliver Sørensen Jensen. The victory was narrow but ultimately deserved, with Parma edging the statistical battle across most key metrics.


Match Analysis

For large stretches of the afternoon, this contest offered little in the way of decisive action, with both sides broadly cancelling each other out in a tight midfield battle. Parma controlled the ball fractionally more — 51% possession to Pisa's 49% — and were the more threatening side in the final third, registering 15 total shots compared to Pisa's 12, and crucially converting 5 shots on target versus Pisa's 3.

Pisa's discipline was also a concern throughout. The visitors committed 19 fouls — nearly double Parma's 10 — and were booked twice in the first half. Simone Canestrelli was cautioned as early as the 18th minute for a foul, followed by İsak Vural in the 44th. Vural's afternoon ended at half-time, with Gabriele Piccinini introduced at the break in his place. Despite those setbacks, Pisa largely stayed competitive — their 86% successful pass percentage (marginally edging Parma's 85%) reflected a team that kept the ball reasonably well, but their 7 shots off target and 3 offsides pointed to a lack of cutting edge.

Coach Oscar Hiljemark turned to his bench in the second half, deploying Idrissa Touré, Henrik Wendel Meister, Lorran Lucas Pereira de Sousa, and veteran Juan Guillermo Cuadrado Bello in search of a breakthrough. However, the changes failed to produce the desired impact.

It was Parma coach Carlos Antón Cuesta whose substitutions proved transformative. The introduction of Nesta Elphege in the 66th minute and Oliver Sørensen Jensen in the 78th created the decisive combination. With eight minutes remaining, Sørensen Jensen delivered the assist that allowed Elphege to finish with conviction and break the deadlock. A late booking for Niakhate Ndiaye in the 89th minute briefly raised tensions, but Parma held on comfortably to secure the win. Their 7 corners compared to Pisa's 4 further illustrated their dominance in attacking areas across the full 90.


Prediction Review

Our pre-match analysis had forecast a 1–1 draw, assigning a 41.2% probability to a Parma win, 31.9% to a draw, and 26.9% to a Pisa victory, with a relatively modest confidence rating of 58/100. The outcome — a Parma win — was the most likely scenario according to our model, yet the draw was the central prediction, making this a near-miss in directional terms. The low confidence score was reflective of genuine uncertainty, and in hindsight the statistical profile of the match — Parma's superior shot volume, corner count, and disciplined defensive structure — aligned well with a home win narrative. The model's hesitancy was understandable, but the data ultimately supported the result.


Key Takeaways

  • Substitute impact was decisive: Elphege and Sørensen Jensen combined in the closing stages to deliver the winning goal, underscoring the value of Cuesta's bench decisions.
  • Pisa's ill-discipline was costly: 19 fouls and two early yellow cards disrupted their rhythm and ultimately contributed to their inability to impose themselves.
  • Parma's efficiency told: Despite the tight overall statistics, Parma converted their opportunities more cleanly, and their 42 dangerous attacks versus Pisa's 39 reflected their greater threat throughout.

Parma vs Pisa — Frequently Asked Questions

Who will win Parma vs Pisa?

PredictNext's AI model favours Parma with a 41% win probability — Parma 41%, draw 32%, Pisa 27%.

What is the predicted score for Parma vs Pisa?

The AI forecasts a 1-1 scoreline for Parma vs Pisa, generated with 58% model confidence.

Will Parma vs Pisa have over 2.5 goals?

The model gives 28% for over 2.5 goals and 72% for under 2.5 goals in Parma vs Pisa.

How accurate was the Parma vs Pisa prediction?

PredictNext's AI predicted 1-1; the match finished 1-0. The winner call was correct.

More Serie A AI Predictions